- MP3/WAV (BWF) recording, with files saved directly to SD/SDHC memory cards
- 44.1/48/96kHz sample rate selections, in 16 or 24-bit quantization
- Switchable balanced XLR Mic/Line inputs with +48V phantom power
- Battery-powered operation via 4 AA Alkaline, providing over 5 hours of typical operation (unit also accepts off-the-shelf rechargeable NiMH batteries. Batteries not included)
- USB 2.0 data port for fast transfer of files to PC/Mac
UPDATE 8-2010:
I've put alot of hours on my PMD661, made a custom case for it, and now I must report a MINOR negative about a whole class of products (the 661, the H4n, certain flashlights, etc)
While doing flashlight testing on the Fenix TK-40, 'Menace' pointed out that it seemed to drain AA batteries without being used AT ALL while a similar light, the TK30 did not. I confirmed his findings using an inline ampmeter a small amount of power was flowing with the light turned off. As I measured other products that used the AA NiMH cell, the problem proved to be a bigger issue than just one flashlight.
This "trickle" power is just like your car leave it in a garage at the airport for 30 days and don't expect the battery to be full when you return. The amount is small, but placing a plastic strip between a battery and the spring then routing it out of the battery compartment will stop the power from flowing. The "off" power is higher on the PMD661 because it has a timer and can turn itself on for play or record functions with preprogrammed times which other recorders can not do.
Update 9-12-2009 I just returned from a cruise ship using the 661. I used a Canon hs-10 avchd camera for capturing the main stage video and the 661 to plug into the ship's mixing board for audio. The ship's audio engineer was excited to see the 661 and hapily pulled out an XLR patch cord set to give me the house mix line level out, which was recorded in the same lossless format (24bit/48 khz) used by the camcorder audio making synchronization in adobe premiere pro a breeze. The final benefit was hearing the show audio as it left the mixing board to the amps instead of being picked up by the camera set on a tripod in the audience full of echo and laughter, clapping etc. The final production to blu-ray disc sounded like I was right on stage with the camera. The marantz ALC circuit performed better than expected and prevented digital clipping while maximizing dynamic range. End of edit.
[ACTUAL PRODUCT REVIEW BEGINS HERE]
When Marantz added a line level XLR input that bypassed the microphone preamps as opposed to just a mic level input in the 660 (prior model) I finally jumped at it. Since I work alot of mixing boards I have access to the final stereo mixdown at line level voltages. Whats the big deal? Recording at line level gives you 20dB more signal to noise thats 100 times better for those who don't speak dB compared to mic level xlr inputs. Also recorders that put an attenuator in front of microphone amplifiers tend to be noisy marantz is not built this way (the H4n I use for MIC level recordings is it is not well suited to line level input because it must attenuate the signal to 0.8% before recording it) If you look at your dvd player at home all the outputs are line level simply to get rid of noise. With such a fabulous recorder, why in the world would you want 100 times more noise in your recordings?
There are many other factors Marantz did that made the 661 the optimum professional recorder to get the display is bright and easy to read under all lighting conditions, they used a 1/4" headphone jack so the little 3.5mm headphones wouldn't pull out at the worst moment (another pro move) and they improved the case quality. There is also a digital input for people who are 100% digital already, however it stops at 44.1/48 KHz sampling.
Given these features, the PMD-661 sits head and antlers above all the other compact recorders out there offering professional connectivity at an economical price. It's also fully customizable the bright display is dimmable through 8 steps for indoor club use at night, and it features dual rca line level outputs for analog playback. About the only thing I would like to have seen would be a worldclock input for synchronizing analog recordings to digital cameras, but the size of the bnc connector would have nixed that option in this handheld product.
Prices are starting to drop I bought in early but you can save 50 bucks off the original price. Good job Marantz (from a former dedicated tascam fan!)
PROS:
+2 levels of power saving (dual VU meter cutoff and 5 line down to 1 line OLED display) both are independent of each other
+runs on AC power through a 5V converter and also runs off USB power when doing file transfers
+Easy to create multiple folders and levels within them using the 4-way rocker buttons for character selection in fact naming your settings is also easy.
+remote control is customizable with just resistors and switches if you know how to solder and need to operate it by computer or other external devices
+XLR ins are well designed and quiet compared to other products on the market.
+1/8" line level TRS input as well lets you use a 3.5mm trs male to male jumper for recording computer outputs
+digital input as well [COAX] I purchased a Cables to Go 40019 Optical to Coaxial Digital Audio Converter (Black) when needed for $13
+2 ea built in mics as the 4th source
+tripod mount
+pre-record buffer captures 3 seconds of audio prior to entering record
+standard SD card format can be ejected and read on a pc quickly instead of doing USB transfers
+easily updates firmware when improvements are made
+12 hour runtime on 2700 mah nimh cells with full power conservation recording mp3 from XLR in (tested)
+When batteries are exhausted it closes all files and shuts down politely.
+internal stereo speakers can be used to monitor recordings or 1/4" headphones
+rugged, well built design including the battery door which has a large latch to prevent accidental opening or loss
+ALC design is well engineered and not noticable in recordings seems like it uses fuzzy logic to prevent clipping.
+coaxial manual level adjustment allows for separate l/r level difference and ganged level adjustment of both simultaneously
Cons
-timer based recording draws more "off" power inserting an insulator made from a plastic battery case easily prevents draining batteries until you need to start if you do not use the timer functions.
-can not entirely shut off the display most minimal power usage is to shut off LED vu meter and just have one line of text in the OLED window with essential data on it.
-lacks a 1/8" mic in but has a 1/8" stereo TRS line in instead so all mic level voltages must go in via XLRs
-4 input sources but only 3 personalities means one input won't be used without reconfiguring (usually digital in)
-lacks digital out (other than USB and removing SD card)
Buy Marantz PMD661 Portable SD Recorder Now
Yes, the price on this baby is steep. You can get a pretty good Marantz HT receiver for this money.But what you get for the price of two Edirol HDs is a leap in sound quality, build quality, and ease of use. Build quality may or may not matter in your situation. The way my stuff gets hit in the field, it's important for me. Camera tripod mount is great for this unit--it sets it apart from the mics on mic stands and helps others to notice the piece of high-end gear on the stand and try to be careful around it.
Data dumps are a breeze in Mac and Windows. I've had no file misreads yet, anywhere.
Line-in XLR allows full low-noise field mastering in a multi-mic stereo setup.
hi-res lossless is the selling point for many at this price level. There is simply nothing else at this price point that can do this resolution.
And because of the XLR line ins, your hi-res lossless recordings will have an exceptionally low noise floor.
None of the mid-level digital recorders can do this, and this is why I ponied up.
It sounds so much better than its lower-priced competition that it belongs in this price category beyond them.
If you want Edirol quality sound, Marantz makes the 620 for you, a thoroughly competent unit in its price class.
But if you have significant audio to record and you are willing to spend an extra 300 bucks to get far better audio quality, this unit will make you happy.
Read Best Reviews of Marantz PMD661 Portable SD Recorder Here
I'll be brief; First off I will state that I am very particular, and hard to please. I have been in the audio/music/broadcast business about 40 yearsI have not used any of the other flash recorders. Prior to purchasing I did heavy research and the PMD661 fit my needs. This has the features I want, and the sound quality is amazing. I have used it with a Rode NT4 stereo mic, a Sennheiser shotgun mic, a Sennheiser broadcast headset, and direct from the console via spdf digital. All produced great recordings.
The internal mics will do in a pinch, but are not the best, and the preamp for the internal mic is noisy. The external mic preamps are clean and quiet. At first I though there was a lot of noise, but it turns out to be from the headphone amp. The actual files sound great.
Transferring tracks is a breeze
The design and build quality are fantastic
cons;
Headphone amp is VERY weak seriously. I would pay for a mod.
Software included is for Windows only
Internal mics pick up a lot of handling noise.
No timecode sync
Cost a bit high but then well you get what you pay for. This is suitable for professional work.
My purchase through Amazon was quick and easy as usual.
Buy one. You will not be disappointed
Want Marantz PMD661 Portable SD Recorder Discount?
I'm from Brazil and I bought this item because i'm coordinating a sound bank projecthere, in the context of a sound design school. The school bought zoom H4n with directional Akg mics
My setup is a Rode Ntg-1 Rode NT4, Rode Blimp and Marantz PMD661.
Some considerations:
1 The recorder is very good, very easy to use. Mutch better than Zoom in terms of sound quality
and built quality. Zoom though, comes with some very nice features, like a swiss knife.
Limiter is one of them that Marantz doesen't have and can be very usefull.
Other like a metronome is useless for me, but can be nice for bands or musical groups that want to record rehearsals.
2 I did some recording of the cheering for the first Brazilian match in the world cup with North Korea in São Paulo, with the NT4 and the internal mics. The difference is huge.
The Nt4 gives us a very nice sound stage. Since i was in a neighbourhood with lots of residential buildings we can here a lot of sounds coming from everywhere and NT4 delivers it.
The internal mics not. So, not good for ambience and similar sounds.
3 Well, I did a lot of research and MaRANTZ seem to be the best for me, considering i use it for also different purposes. I needed something with good quality for ambience and foley
and also internal mics that could be usefull(not like those of the Fostex Fr2-Le for instance). So i'll use the
internal mics just for rehearsals and interviews (i'm also a musical director for a theater company).
They are ok for that purpose.
4 When you use just one entrance in stereo recording mode, like a directional mic on L, the other Chanel (R) sounds very noisy in the headphone.
So using just one entrance you are obligated to use the true mono recording feature.
But on the other hand it's very nice, because you don't need to ocupate useless space in the sd card.
Well i loved it, i bought also the Marantz Carry case, it fits the unit perfectly and it has a lot of openings for the cables
and the entrances. But it just fits the unit, anithing else, like extra batteries and cables must be carried
in a extra bag.
Best Choice
Oh and excuse me for my English.
Save 19% Off
I've owned this unit for a few weeks and I must say that Marantz really hit one out of the park with this one. I had previously owned a PMD660 and it was a nice enough unit, but I could never understand its wild popularity. It had a cheap feel to it and the sound was mediocre. The 661, on the other hand, is a tank. Think of the 660 as the rough draft for this finished product. Just about everything is done right this time and the sound through the improved preamps is significantly cleaner. I've read some comments that it may be a little large, especially considering how compact much of the competition is nowadays, but I think the size is perfect. You can easily hold it in one hand and the display is big, bright and easy to read at a glance.The only improvement I can think of offhand, possibly in a 2nd generation unit (are you listening Marantz?) would be a color display. As easy as this one is to read it would be even easier if record mode glowed with a red "rec" and pause with a green "pause."
Highly recommended.
No comments:
Post a Comment